|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1117
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 02:36:44 -
[1] - Quote
0. Good 1. Agree - T3 destroyers should never have been made, never mind so hilariously broken. 2. Agree - although there are was to tweak what we have now. 3. Temporary fighting then empty spaces. 4. Possibly. Also allow coalitions to take less space. Heard some vague mentions of team sites coming.
Don't say EVE is dying, people get excited about that.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
SOV is stagnant because Low Sec is not the next step from High Sec and a viable place to grow alliances to the point they can challenge Null alliances.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1119
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 18:40:43 -
[2] - Quote
Eli Stan wrote: 2. If some system was worth taking, you have to work (structure grind) for it. Now you are going to make it simple and almost effortless.. Burn system, flip to Free Port. Wait for new residents. Burn. Repeat.
(Mean while hold the moons and make the real ISK)
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
SOV is stagnant because Low Sec is not the next step from High Sec and a viable place to grow alliances to the point they can challenge Null alliances.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1120
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 00:58:36 -
[3] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:A plausible reason why CCP would suddenly be willing to cut off the fat would be the possibility that a player will only purchase one copy of special edition things like the CE (which is dirt cheap now), regardless of their number of accounts. If the business model is adjusted slightly from monthly subscriptions to microtransaction vanity items, it makes complete sense for CCP to wean itself from multi-account (per player) income. Alts will exist as long as there are viable play denial tactics
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
SOV is stagnant because Low Sec is not the next step from High Sec and a viable place to grow alliances to the point they can challenge Null alliances.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1122
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 12:56:54 -
[4] - Quote
Ned Thomas wrote:Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:[quote]1) They addressed the Svipul and already mentioned a balance pass. And while I agree that the D3's are very good, they aren't these invincible killing machines that everyone keeps b*tching about. First of all, a good destroyer has the tank of a frigate with the damage of a cruiser.
Now these things not only have 33% rather than total 25% bonuses, they can change their bonuses according to what is chasing after them. So, the only way to kill them with a very small group is to send one or two D3s after them or to send a counter to each mode after them. Effectively needing 3+ T2 frigates to grab them and then some others to pile on and kill it.
People who try to solo them (in something other than another D3) are kited away and killed far better than the usual ships fulfil that tactic.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
SOV is stagnant because Low Sec is not the next step from High Sec and a viable place to grow alliances to the point they can challenge Null alliances.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
|
|
|